Emilien Demanet vs Otakar Ungerman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent performance in second serve points shows Demanet winning 42.98%, compared to Ungerman's 33.33%. Could this give Demanet an edge? Likely, as second serve performance correlates with match predictions.
• Comparing return game stats, Demanet has won 47.17% of opponents' second serve points, while Ungerman secured 40.74%. The first serve return stats are 33.3% for Demanet and 4.55% for Ungerman, indicating a clear advantage for Demanet.
• Under pressure, Demanet has saved 52.16% of breakpoints, whereas Ungerman has only saved 20%. How crucial is this for in-game betting? Very, as it shows Demanet's resilience under pressure.
• Over the past year, Demanet has won 48.28% of all matches (W/L 28/30), whereas Ungerman has not won a match (W/L 0/3).
• Demanet's best surface is Hard, with a 57% win rate, while Ungerman has 0% win rate on all noted surfaces including I.hard, their historically best surface.
• For lower-level tournaments ($10K Futures/Satellites/ITF), Demanet has a 49.12% match win rate, but Ungerman remains winless with 0%.
• Demanet has faced opponents with an average rank of 414.81. In contrast, Ungerman faced higher-ranked opponents with an average of 212, which might explain some recent struggles.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Demanet's 39% win rate suggests better odds compared to Ungerman, who has not won any deciding sets.
• In terms of breakpoint conversion during recent matches, Demanet has managed 35.29%, whereas Ungerman has converted none of their opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (June 17, 2025, UTC):

Demanet's statistically superior performance on both serve and return, especially under pressure, highlights a significant advantage over Ungerman in the upcoming match.

The stark contrast in match and breakpoint conversion rates between the two players currently underscores Demanet's favorability. Notably, Demanet's resilience in pressure situations further augments their probability of success.

Considering the comprehensive analysis of form, surface advantage, and match experience, Demanet has a greater likelihood of clinching victory in this encounter.